| The only one of the Big Three
to resist a complete body change is Chevrolet, and it is by
far the best equipped of the lowest priced group to do so. With
a more than comfortable '56 sales lead over Ford and an unbroken
record of winning every sales race for more than 20 years, Chevy
can complacently count on coming out ahead once more in '57.
There are many changes
in the new Chevrolet, and most of them seem aimed at making
the even hotter one hotter yet.
The test car, a Bel Air four-door
hardtop, had a fresh look when compared with its year-old
counterpart. What it may have lost in identity as a Chevrolet,
it has gained in resemblance to Buick and Olds at the front
and to Cadillac at the rear. Not a few Chevy fanciers will
consider this similarity highly desirable.
Like many first-off -the-line
cars, ours had an odd combination of equipment. The engine
was the hottest of Chevy's non-fuel-injected varieties, putting
out 270 horsepower and using two four-barrel carburetors,
solid valve lifters, and the hot cam. Curiously coupled with
this was Powerglide. Either Turboglide (not available on the
earliest cars, which we were forced to choose from) or a manual
shift would have given us better times in the acceleration
runs. Further checks will be made later in the year with cars
better broken-in, as well as more logically equipped. Important
variations will be reported to you.
The test car had neither power
brakes nor power steering.
How would you expect this particular
Chevrolet to stack up to some of the other performance combinations
available in the line? This is the hottest carburetor engine;
compared with the 250-horsepower FI powerplant, or any of
the other carburetor-equipped choices, this engine should
give more go and less economy. Comparing Powerglide with other
transmissions, it doesn't give the acceleration you'll get
from the new Turboglide or from a stick shift. The stick shift
has better economy than either automatic, and Turboglide's
fuel mileage shouldn't differ much from that of Powerglide
if you drive conservatively. That, by the way, will be hard
to do.
Will It Be Best-Handling
Car Again in '57?
It doesn't look that way. Retaining
its ball-joint front suspension, Chevrolet has cancelled out
some of its advantages by going to a somewhat softer ride,
with resultant greater lean on corners, and less confidence
for the driver. There is no question that the car looks and
feels bigger, and we can't blame Chevy for giving in to the
buying public's apparent feelings in the matter. Personally,
we prefer the taut feel of the '56.
The non-power steering is easy.
Except in parking, the GM power steering really isn't needed
except for someone whose physical condition demands it. Chevy
retains its high-mounted wheel and most drivers will sit high,
as in the Ford.
The instruments are newly mounted
in a higher position, the cowl itself having been dropped
slightly to give a newer look. (Unfortunately this made it
necessary to move the freshair intake back to the front of
the car. The "new" grilles around the headlights
for this purpose are in a position that has been generally
discredited because of exhaust fumes in close traffic.)
Vision is good and, we're glad
to say, undistorted. An exception is the rear-view -mirror,
now cowl mounted. It blocks the right front fender for shorter
drivers and isn't big enough to make the wrap-around rear
window truly useful. The Eldorado fins help in parking.
Out on the open road, connoisseurs
of handling will note the same tendency to get bigger and
softer at the expense of crispness in handling. Though you
won't have to fight the wheel, front-end heaviness is evident
in a mushier feel. The figures show that Chevrolet has the
best weight distribution among the three cars, but the driver
benefits little.
Recovery to an originally straight
course when the wheel is whipped from side to side is fair.
A sharply crowned road demands considerable correction.
Despite these criticisms, the
'57 Chevrolet remains a good car to handle. We feel that the
tendency to let power outstrip the chassis has popped up here,
however, and we're ag'in it.
Is It As Roadable As
It Was?
It takes irregular surfaces in
its stride. Normal highway dips cause it no embarrassment.
When they get bad, it bounces (but doesn't bottom) and then
recovers quickly with no oscillation to bother the driver.
On curves, body lean and tire
squeal combine to wain you of approaching limits. You have
all the necessary power to pull out if you get in trouble,
but see that you stay on the pavement for sure control.
At ordinary speeds on soft or
washboard roads, control is surprisingly good. Elapsed time
need iot suffer on-back roads, and passengers will fare better
than in earlier Chevrolets.
Is the Hotter One the
Hottest?
There's no doubt that it still
holds the title in its field. Particularly when you remember
that we had a low-performance transmission, the test figures
are impressive. It beat all the times of last year's powerpacked
test car and all the times of the Ford and Plymouth this year
except for the Plymouth's time from 0 mph.
Much more pleasing to us than
the standing-start times are those for acceleration at passing
speeds. They should, of course, not be abused by the power-happy,
and quite possibly that's what will happen. Still, a car that
can almost fly from 45 to 60 in a mere 2.9 seconds is one
that should be capable of keeping you and your family out
of trouble.
The extremely slow shift of the
Powerglide transmission makes us hope that it will soon be
dropped in favor of Turbo glide. Rough idling can be expected
from the hot camshaft the powerpack engine.
What Has Happened to
Fuel Mileage?
The steady speed consumption
figures have suffered with the huge increase in power. Ordinary
driving, with its conditions closer to those you might experience
with your own car, yielded little change from last year's
comparable car. If you want a real high-performance car this
year and still have to consider your gasoline bill, we have
a suggestion: learn to drive smoothly and conservatively as
a general rule, saving bursts of speed or acceleration for
special occasions. It's more fun that way, it will mean money
in your pocket, and your passengers will be less ruffled.
How Are the Brakes?
This test car had just been born
when we took it over, so we had tester Jeff Cooper take it
on a leisurely trip over varying terrain to break it in. He
returned it with this note attached: "Brakes are inadequate
for mountain driving or highway with traffic. Fade early."
Time was so short that we couldn't complete our regular tests
in time for this issue. A full report will follow.
Does It Ride Better?
The ride is considerably softer
than on the '55 and '56 Chevrolet. Road irregularities, from
highway tar strips up through, the tribulations of a washboard
surface, will give passengers no trouble. As in the Ford,
driver and passengers are aware I of the surface without being
bothered by it.
The body leans more than before,
and passengers will be pitched about very slightly more than
in previous models.
Is the Engine Compartment
Cluttered?
It's one of the cleanest we've
seen, even allowing for the power equipment not present on
the test car. An enormous space in front of the radiator is
useless, but you can get around the compact V8 with refreshing
ease. A giant air cleaner assembly has to be removed for any
serious work. Plugs are inaccessible.
What's Different About
a Chevrolet?
You'll like a firmly put-together
air, characteristic of its Fisher bodies for years past and
of its chassis since 1955. Along with the V8's smoothness,
the high quality of interior trim,, the softer ride and the
use of various components present in bigger GM cars, this
can almost make you think you're in a higher price bracket.
Specific features worthy of engineering respect and exclusive
to Chevrolet in its field are the lightweight engine and the
Turboglide, which we heartily recommend if a Chevy is your
choice and it's optional on the model you want. Unsurpassed
smoothness and accelerating power combine with the new HR
(hill retarder) range to make as satisfying a transmission
as any automatic we've driven. In our brief test on. the GM
Proving Ground at Milford, Mich. it slowed us down on steep
grades as though with a giant hand, which it should since
this is its only function. It gives no advantage in acceleration
(not that one is needed! ) and so makes Turboglide just about
as completely automatic as it can get until the day when it
can see a 'hill ahead and decide itself to shift to hill retarder.
Chevrolet continues the GM keyless
locking system. A Chevy driver has two blessed conveniences
missing from the Ford and Plymouth: a centered glove compartment,
and complete absence of distortion in the wrap-around windshield.
We regard both,, as minimal requirements in a modern car.
Nor arc they conveniences, alone; both are aids to safety
and all manufacturers should adopt them permanently in 1958,
even over the wails of their stylists.
You get the most accurate speedometer
in any U.S. car.
The new low-set tail lights,
smaller than most, do not give adequate protection against
rear-end collisions.
Will It Last a Long Time?
A car that is not all new is
likely to be a better bet for the' long-term owner than one
that still has some wrinkles to be ironed out during the first
model year. A poorly hung rear door whose window was extremely
tough to roll down, uneven paint on the dash molding, and
badly fitting brightwork on the dash itself marred the looks
of the test car. Check these points (which should be improved
later in the year) along with quality of exterior paint and
any rear-axle hum in the particular Chevy that meets your
specifications.
|